SUPREME COURT BECOMES BITCH BOI'S TO THE BIG BANKS
My reading of the United States Constitution guarantees each citizen a right to be heard. We want to solve disputes in courtrooms. Not with violence.
A popular way to make decisions, with a scientific protocol is Occam's Razor, a useful guide, to flesh out the truth.
(from Wikipedia)
Occam's razor (also Ockham's razor; Latin: lex parsimoniae "law of parsimony") is a problem-solving principle attributed to William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347), who was an English Franciscan friar, scholastic philosopher, and theologian. His principle can be interpreted as stating Among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected.
Did Gary Ozenne receive his constitution right to bring the wrong do'ers into court to determine the truth of his accusations? Did he receive an opportunity to make the bank
Did Gary Ozenne have an opportunity to testify to the court? Did the court deny the victim, me, his only way, short of violence to resolve this dispute?
Why would all of the judge's in the 9th circuit, and now, the United States Supreme Court, forget constitutional rights, given to all citizens.
Was it because exhibits filed for 15 years would not be good for the banks in a court of law which would submit 2 documents. 1) My bankruptcy filing on May 17, 2001. 2) Carol O' Neal recorded a trustees deed on May 29, 2001
This proves their behavior, violating 11 USC 362(a). And is why the courts have denied me my day in court. Why didn't they order a trial, and let these big banks and criminal service agents, answer to my charges, hmmmm I wonder ?
No comments:
Post a Comment