In May of 2001, my home for over a quarter of a century, in Corona CA, was sold at a foreclosure sale in spite of the facts that (A) I was not behind on my payments, and, (B) It was against federal law, since I was protected by a bankruptcy stay, 11 USC 362.
In a nutshell, I have been denied my rights, as a citizen found in the constituton under the 1st 5th and 14h amendments to that constitution,insuring due process
I have never been given a courtroom opportunity to make my assertions and show the proof of the facts of my case of settled law of 11 USC 362. The court did not rule on the particular facts of my case but instead, it ruled it had no jurisdiction to hear my complaint, once the case was dismissed.
A 2006 appellate case, In re Nathan Johnson 9th Cir. 2006 BAP July 7, 2006,
ruled that it did have jurisdiction.
No hearing, or trial for Gary
In a nutshell, I have been denied my rights, as a citizen found in the constituton under the 1st 5th and 14h amendments to that constitution,insuring due process
Today I am seeking an experienced civil rights attorney, and any assistance from my United States representatives, to help me gain my day in court.
Unfortunately, I have been self represented since the beginning of the appeals process,which debated jurisdiction, but ignored my charges, finally the 9th Circuit en banc, "determined" I was trying to take a shortcut, by petitioning for a writ of mandamus , which I believed was my only relief, since the statue of limitations had run to appeal, instead of requesting an exception for the time to appeal, which the court deemed was the proper procedure, but never addressed my charges. Dismissed again!
The court presumed, that I should have known, that a petition to extend the statute of limitations,was the correct way to gain relief , not a writ of mandamus, which orders the lower court to follow the law, which I believed was my only path forward.
I am looking for justice, and seeking an attorney, government representative to help me obtain my civil rights, dividing the award, which could be substantial.
When I brought a new motion for sanctions, based on this new case law, I showed up at the February 14, 2011 hearing, on my motion for sanctions I learned, for the first time, that my case had been dismissed, earlier, four days past the time to appeal under the statute of limitations.
I had never gotten notice that my case had already been dismissed, I immediately filed a declaration that I never received notice of dismissal. It was and past the statute of limitations to appeal.
My case is important in that it illustrates the fact that our constitutional law can or cannot be depended upon. This is on our most base law; The Constitution, to the United States of America.
My case evolved from the specific undeniable facts to the general judicial debate of the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel BAP, about the jurisdiction of this BAP, leaving uninspected the violations of law which brought this case before them.
In short, I am looking for an advocate attorney, media attention, government representative, for assistance, that feels a passion to correct this grevious violations of law by this giant bank and their perfidious service agent; Ocwen
My case is important in that it illustrates the fact that our constitutional law can or cannot be depended upon. This is on our most base law; The Constitution, to the United States of America.
My case evolved from the specific undeniable facts to the general judicial debate of the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel BAP, about the jurisdiction of this BAP, leaving uninspected the violations of law which brought this case before them.
In short, I am looking for an advocate attorney, media attention, government representative, for assistance, that feels a passion to correct this grevious violations of law by this giant bank and their perfidious service agent; Ocwen
Gary L. Ozenne
firesprinklers@gmail.com
423-707-8949
No comments:
Post a Comment